Cleavr · Early stage · Building in public
Systematic biomarker discovery for triple-negative breast cancer.
Cleavr tests candidate TNBC biomarkers against public sequencing data, subtype by subtype — with every claim independently re-derived and checked against the literature before it's published.
TCGA-VerifiedSubtype-Level AnalysisIndependently Re-DerivedLiterature Cross-CheckedOpen MethodologyCase Study 01 — GNRHR
TCGA-VerifiedSubtype-Level AnalysisIndependently Re-DerivedLiterature Cross-CheckedOpen MethodologyCase Study 01 — GNRHR
01Problem
TNBC isn't one disease — but it's still targeted like one.
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is not one disease. Lehmann's 2011 classification split TNBC into distinct molecular subtypes — basal-like, mesenchymal, luminal androgen receptor, and others — each with different biology and different drug sensitivities. Despite that, candidate biomarker and targeting studies are still mostly done one gene, one paper, one lab at a time, without systematically checking whether a target behaves consistently across subtypes before it gets built into a therapeutic strategy.
02Approach
Test it against real data before it becomes a strategy.
Cleavr tests candidate TNBC biomarkers against public, patient-level sequencing data — starting with TCGA — broken out by molecular subtype, and cross-checks every claim against the primary literature before it's published. Every number is independently re-derived from raw source files in a second pass, not computed once and trusted. Null results get reported exactly as directly as positive ones.
03Status
One case study live. Independently verified, start to finish.
Case Study 01 · Complete
GNRHR expression across TNBC molecular subtypes
Does the LHRH/GnRH receptor (GNRHR) — the target of an active TNBC nanoparticle-targeting strategy — express differently across TNBC's molecular subtypes? If it does, that would matter for how consistently a receptor-targeted therapy could work across the disease's biological variants.
p = 0.98
survival, log-rank
Result: no statistically significant difference across subtypes, and no relationship to survival in this cohort — a real, well-caveated null result.
04Updates
Milestones, as they happen.
- 2026-07-08Screening pipeline shipped. The GNRHR analysis is now a reusable, gene-agnostic pipeline: candidates sourced systematically (Open Targets), tested for subtype- and survival-association with Benjamini–Hochberg correction applied across every gene tested together, and cross-referenced against known druggability (ChEMBL) and existing TNBC-specific literature coverage (PubMed). Run against a 15-gene candidate set as a first test — results are internal for now, pending the same cross-cohort verification Case Study 01 went through before anything gets published as a finding.
- 2026-07-08Cleavr goes public. Site live on GitHub Pages — full methodology, code, and data open for review.
- 2026-07-07Case Study 01 published. GNRHR expression tested across TNBC molecular subtypes using TCGA data (n=116), independently re-derived and literature-checked.
05Roadmap
From one gene to a real discovery pipeline.
- Cross-cohort validation — check findings against a second dataset (METABRIC) so results don't rest on one cohort.
- Literature cross-referencing, deeper — current pipeline checks how much TNBC-specific coverage a gene already has; next step is surfacing the actual relevant papers per candidate, not just a count.
- Queryable biomarker index — one place to check any gene's subtype-level expression and survival association, not a one-off write-up per gene.
06Contact
Have a biomarker in mind?
Built by Sushanth Somayajula. Full methodology, data, and code for every case study are public.