Cleavr · Early stage · Building in public

Systematic biomarker discovery for triple-negative breast cancer.

Cleavr tests candidate TNBC biomarkers against public sequencing data, subtype by subtype — with every claim independently re-derived and checked against the literature before it's published.

View Case Study 01 → Open the explorer →
TCGA-VerifiedSubtype-Level AnalysisIndependently Re-DerivedLiterature Cross-CheckedOpen MethodologyCase Study 01 — GNRHR TCGA-VerifiedSubtype-Level AnalysisIndependently Re-DerivedLiterature Cross-CheckedOpen MethodologyCase Study 01 — GNRHR
01Problem

TNBC isn't one disease — but it's still targeted like one.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is not one disease. Lehmann's 2011 classification split TNBC into distinct molecular subtypes — basal-like, mesenchymal, luminal androgen receptor, and others — each with different biology and different drug sensitivities. Despite that, candidate biomarker and targeting studies are still mostly done one gene, one paper, one lab at a time, without systematically checking whether a target behaves consistently across subtypes before it gets built into a therapeutic strategy.

02Approach

Test it against real data before it becomes a strategy.

Cleavr tests candidate TNBC biomarkers against public, patient-level sequencing data — starting with TCGA — broken out by molecular subtype, and cross-checks every claim against the primary literature before it's published. Every number is independently re-derived from raw source files in a second pass, not computed once and trusted. Null results get reported exactly as directly as positive ones.

03Status

One case study live. Independently verified, start to finish.

Case Study 01 · Complete

GNRHR expression across TNBC molecular subtypes

Does the LHRH/GnRH receptor (GNRHR) — the target of an active TNBC nanoparticle-targeting strategy — express differently across TNBC's molecular subtypes? If it does, that would matter for how consistently a receptor-targeted therapy could work across the disease's biological variants.

116
TNBC patients
p = 0.71
across subtypes
p = 0.98
survival, log-rank

Result: no statistically significant difference across subtypes, and no relationship to survival in this cohort — a real, well-caveated null result.

04Updates

Milestones, as they happen.

05Roadmap

From one gene to a real discovery pipeline.

06Contact

Have a biomarker in mind?

Built by Sushanth Somayajula. Full methodology, data, and code for every case study are public.

Get in touch → View on GitHub →